Happy Canada Day!
I’m finally taking a stand against the irritating overuse of
the word ‘icon’ and all its derivatives with the exception of
‘iconoclast’. I began to be
annoyed by its use months ago when I unpacked the first of many Emails that I
have since received. The
confidently pious wording assumed that it was being read by a person whose
outrage would equal that of the sender.
It informed me that the ‘iconic’ words, “God keep our land” in the
Canadian National Anthem were under threat of being replaced. I should join the 85% of Canadians who
were against this. Like so many of
the Emails that either drip saccharin sentiment or assume right thinking, it
ended with a near threat that if I didn’t share its views and forward it to
every person I could think of I would suffer. I deleted it and didn’t think about it again until I got
another. I snapped. Iconic! I spent my whole youth singing “We stand on guard for thee”,
a few too many repetitions perhaps, but at least there was never any appeal to a
deity to save the land. Or was I wrong?
I was driven to Google it.
Yes! God only entered the
scene in 1968 when the Pearson Government made “O Canada” the official national
anthem, after changing a few words on the advice of a committee. So that committee created an ‘icon’. I didn’t like the addition of god in
1968 and I still don’t. It seemed
like a thoughtless copying of the U.S. anthem. I also don’t like prayer circles before athletic events, but
I digress. I know that the word
‘icon’ is used all the time now in its computer context, but it’s being thrown
around in association with moustaches and words that were added to anthems by
committees that were struck in my lifetime irks me. That’s my rant for the week, but I know that the word ‘icon’
will continue to jump out at me and give me a little frisson of fury every time
it does. When Jim was around, he
got riled up enough for both of us.
As the years went by, I sometimes thought to myself that I had been very
attracted to an angry young man but I wasn’t so sure if an angry old man would
have the same appeal. But now that
I’m alone, I find I can’t live without a bit of irritation, a bit of the Bill
Needles. I have to get riled on my
own. It’s invigorating, up to a
point.
The rest of this blog will be roses because I did very
little other than extreme gardening this week. My many absences combined with the amount of rain we’ve had
this spring turned the yard into a weed bed. It’s good Jay gave me the hand and lower-arm- strengthening
thing for my birthday because I’ve been using it and I’ve needed every bit of muscle I have in that area to pull
out the thousands of weeds. I now
have a plan to cover the pathways and bare spots that I’ve cleared with
newspaper and then mulch so that I never have to do this again. The idea is similar to the lasagna
garden that Caroline made with such success. I hope it works.
When I’m sick of weeding, I stand up, stretch and look at
the roses.
Hello dear Jan! I'm catching up with all your posts; enjoyed immensely a vicarious stay in Korea with your family; and discovered some commonalities. Those "lock" fences: a bridge close to Notre Dame in Paris boasts the same thing. And your mother and I share the same birthday - June 7th.
ReplyDeleteThe roses look absolutely stunning. What is their scent like? I'm looking forward to seeing you here for our WWW gathering in August! Love -- Mary Lou